|
|
FLIGHTS FROM MUNICH TO LONDON
Purpose: Help find & book cheap return flights from
Munich to London & back
Title used to be "to Gatwick" but they stopped that route
:-(
I AM NOT A TRAVEL AGENT
PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME FOR ADVICE ON FLIGHTS !
I Am A Computer Systems Engineer And Unix
Consultant
Airlines are welcome to contact me to
Pay Me to fix their sites.
Other than that please only mail me, short
factual corrections, Thanks.
Most Airlines Have SCREWED WEB
SITES, Making Booking An Awful Pain.
Table Order: Will later be best pricing & & least web
defects at top, but currently Table is UNDER CONSTRUCTION, work
suspended till human time found to complete it )
KEYS
( Preferred Answers In Bold, Non preferred in
Italic ).
- AIRLINE Name & Click
able Web
- BROKE ( No / Yes
) - If I find their web at Any Stage broken, using my test
conditions (which include an internal net, a proxy web server
& dsl reduced currently un compensated MTU
(maximum transmission unit) (to be changed later, then
retest).
- SHOK Do they want Shockwave : (
No / Yes )
- FLSH Flashing adverts : (
No / Yes )
- JAVA Java Needed : ( No
/ Yes )
- COOK Cookies Needed : (
No / Yes )
- MUC Do they fly from Munich : (
Yes / No )
- LGW Do they fly to London
Gatwick: ( Yes / No )
- [IN]-DIRECT : (Direct
/ Indirect / Both ) : "Direct" flight to destination,
or "Indirect" via a hub ?
- DATES ( Range /
Fixed ) - "Fixed" dumb single date selector or
optional "Range" of dates to make finding a date easier.
- PRICE Price above are in Euro
inc MWST I presume, for a sample flight I checked 2003.07.20,
of about a week including a Sat. night to get cheaper
rate
- COMMENT Other web site
deficiencies. Or flight detail etc.
As a result of difficult web sites, I buy less flights than I
otherwise would, probably others buy less too, &/or use
airlines with easier web booking systems. Airlines would sell
more tickets if they made selecting & buying a ticket less
trouble !
(The alternative of phoning or going to a travel agent is not
always attractive - risk getting stuck behind some long
enquirer, some agents don't do the discount tickets, &/
or with a lower chance of friendly service than in the UK.
has plenty of friendly travel agents, still Munich on average
(not with reference to travel agents in particular) doesn't
treat customers as well as South East England & London,
though there are exceptions both ways, including both
exceptionally good and bad service in both locations. (Each
country & locality has strong & weak points, just
like web sites too. In each case it's best to adopt good
ideas & approaches from wherever, not to be foolishly
offended when told somewhere else does something better.)
Of course airlines make more from money per head from business
travellers
Many will be in a business mode: "I always travel XYZ-Air,
booked by my in house travel agent" they won't care that they
can't see prices, just flight times, taking the attitude "Rip
my company with another scheduled flight, I'm too busy to
care about price."
But there aren't enough business travellers or seats overall
sold in this shrunken economy,
So airlines Should make it easier for normal people with some
budget constraints to find & book a maximal number of
flights per year.
AIRPORTS
OK there's tons of 'em with web too, for now I'm just listing
two
THE DEFICIENCIES OF AIRLINE WEB SITES
Airlines are so stupid they don't learn from each others'
sites. They fail to comply with basics of good design, (&
by Good design I Don't mean some rubbish a graphic artist or
ad. executive thinks is glitzy - I mean something simple
& easy a customer in a rush can get through quickly to
find & buy a cheap ticket, before customer curses,
decides the whole Pain is taking too long, & gives up
looking & goes back to doing some Work.
STUPID FEATURES
- Don't Clutter Pages Too much rubbish for
shareholders, flight shops & etc. The prime purpose of an
airline is to Sell Seats. Everything else like investor
relations is secondary (the investors want you to Sell Seats
too!), & should be seperate, down the screen, in a
smaller font. The airline already has the investors money
& interest, & the employees's interest etc, to
encourage them to work through web sites they probably half
know already, but the airline doesn't have the browser
customers money until it Sells A Ticket - the Prime Objective
!
- Fonts Buying flights should not be in asserted
small fonts - Some use 1600 x 1200 screens (& bigger),
& then fonts come out small, if asserted, so best leave
fonts un asserted.!
- Colour Don't use Blue for non- click-able text, as
it's what most browsers use For click-able text. Don't use
hard to read fore/background combinations.
- Big Buy Buttons Stupidly small "Select / Find
Price" buttons, make no sense !: When the customer has found
his flight give him a Big button to buy the ticket with,
don't make him hunt how to buy
- Scrap Logins ! - Don't Play The Spanish
Inquisition Some EG Lufthansa want to know too
much about you before they'll sell you a ticket. ( They used
to be so obstructive they wouldn't even tell you flight
schedules before you'd identified yourself.)
- Don't Hide Prices EG Lufthansa.
- Don't Assume Departure Airport Mandates Choice Of
Language Some assume your departure airport defines your
language: Example of such naive stupidity: Air France. Not everyone
flying from Germany is a native German speaker. Some may
prefer English, Spanish, etc Intelligent counter example: KLM (PS & don't get stupid
like Google, who assume just 'cos your browser is coming from
.de, you really want to read German even though you typed google.com
- Don't Shove Shockwave Or Microsoft On Front Page
Some EG Sabena Not every
browser has Shockwave or can download a compatible version to
their browser & operating system. Sabena are so stupid they even
promote Microsoft on their front page - 2 really dumb ways to
scare off some customers before they even start.
Shockwave Note "Why not get
the flash plug in ?". Personally, I'm a computer consultant who avoids Microsoft like
the plague ! . I only run binaries I've built myself from free public source code. (No viruses !
Source allows one to fix or change anything needed, no
ongoing license costs & addiction/ dependency). I'm not
aware of Shockwave in public source code. Linux Mozilla may
supports a flash plug & FreeBSD supports Linux binaries,
but that'd still be an imported binary.
- Accept Credit Cards From Not Just UK EG not like
Expedia Who don't even
use a "Sorry, we only accept other cards or cheques for an
extra handling fee" A friend told me later that expedia.de
will take German cards.
- Show Dates In Unmistakable Easy Edit Format EG Not
like Continental
Avoid American scrambled non progressive dates in strings EG
MMDDYYYY not even with spaces, separators or in seperate
boxes, - a great blinkered way to confuse rest of world. I
guess those insular types never heard of logical/ programming
& accountancy & type dates EG YYYY MM DD HH MM (which
is ideal for sorted lists too)
- Don't Make Flight Schedules Uncopyable Some like
GO used to have their
flight schedules as a graphical image so you couldn't mouse
copy it as text for an offline copy. GO did this, they got bought out,
good riddance to one more bad web feature !
- Don't Flash Excrement Adverts Or Gimmick EG British Midland
- Don't Excrete Cookies or Demand Java Many don't
trust that security invasive stuff. I don't accept that
rubbish, except in a seperate login which owns no real files,
so the unwanted excrement cannot compromise my data.
- Some web design
(KISS) ideas in German language.
- Allow Flexible Date Searches, (Not just fixed
dates) Being able to click on "Look for nearby dates too"
is very useful.
- Don't Use Meaningless Fare Scheme or Product Names
Many of us have no interest in learning such rubbish.
- Tech note: IP MTU: Airlines
might be wise to test after asserting a TCP MTU of 1492 (or
even less), so that even those with an un compensated DSL
gateway can still guarantee to select & purchase flights,
even if gateway not achieving the expected MTU=1500. (Applies
to GO) & some other
sites (airlines & others)
Details of plane(s) that have flown this route. (So that when
booking a flight you can see what you'll be travelling in).
Feel free to (mail me more planes
you've used On This Route, that are Still Flying This Route, or
even better, mail me URLs to other sites who will maintain
better detail & save me the bother).
-
Boeing 737-300 (as
used by Go.)
- 11 in service with Go @ 8.1999
- up to 148 passengers
- 2640km/1650 miles
- 2 x General Electric/SNECMA CFM56-31Cs or 3B1s each
producing 22,000 lbs or 20,000 lbs thrust
- Take-Off Speed 178 mph (285 kph)
- Cruising height/speed: 507 mph @ 3,000 feet
- Landing Speed 154 mph (246 kph)
- Autoland Capability Category 3a
- Length 32.18m (105ft 7in)
- Wingspan 28.9m (94ft 10in)
- Height 11.13m (36ft 6in)
- Fuselage Width 3.8m (12ft 4in)
- Fuel Capacity 20,000 litres
- Fuel Consumption 3,000 litre/2,400 kgs per hour)
- Maximum take off weight 58,000 Kg
- Flight Crew: 2 flight crew, 3-4 cabin crew.
- Nitrogen in tyres "because it doesn't expand" !
- Munich 914 km / 571 miles Average 1hr 55 mins
Some budget airlines (EG Ryan
Air) have forced down prices (great!) & are now
apparently worth double the stock price quotation of British Airways
(amazing!). BUT they do this by over booking seats more than
the traditional majors, & turning away more booked
passengers. That would be fair, if it was like a hotel booking:
You've booked remote by phone but haven't arrived or paid yet.
But the instant they accept you money (even by credit card over
phone/net) they have a binding commitment & should stick to
it or pay considerable compensation. The EU commissioner is apparently
trying to make them reduce their over booking quotient, but
they claim it'd push up costs - tough ! One shouldn't accept
money under false pretence. Don't take my word on this, I'm not
well informed, & this page will Not stay current, just be
aware of the issue, & obtain better info elsewhere, EG
newspaper, web sites, friends experiences etc.
Corrections to this page welcome if short & factual by email
Other than that, please don't email comment, I don't have time
to answer !
If after checking, you agree the criticism of any airline
web site is valid, why not mail the offending airline & ask
them to fix their web site ? (webmaster@WEB_DOMAIN is defined in
Internet standards as the official address for such mail). The
more mail they get, the more likely they are to make choosing
& buying a ticket easier.
Barbara S. recommends : a good coach service:
www.nationalexpress.co.uk
|